Fame comes from being the biggest or best or smartest at key points. Instead, it keeps score via “fame” - a marker that’s hidden throughout the game, and one that the developers said “might surprise you” when you win. Or rather, that it doesn’t have express “conditions” for a variety of victories. It is an attempt to make a game about all of human history that’s about making the most about the position players are in at any given time - about reacting and adapting instead of merely executing.Īt the macro level, Humankind dives into the gray areas with its victory conditions. Humankind is that, and as it’s Amplitude that’s developing Humankind, this makes it worthy of interest.Īs such, the core of the pitch of Humankind is this: If Civilization has become to enamored with long-term planning, with an endgame focus, with dividing into good plans versus bad plans then Humankind is an attempt to muddy those waters. This might sound limited, but there’s actually a lot of room in the anti-Civ genre - despite Civilization’s monumental place in the strategy game universe, it’s only inspired a handful of direct competitors of turn-based games covering the entirety of history. Thus, in a sense, Humankind can only be understood in relation to Civilization. ‘The journey matters more than the destination’ And in the specific niche of the “4X” strategy game, Amplitude Studios, with its excellent Endless Legend and largely successful Endless Space 2, are starting to compete with Firaxis and Civilization on their home turf. Total War, Civ’s only real long-term competitor for the greatest strategy series, has had an uneven but largely fruitful decade. Paradox Interactive games like Europa Universalis 4 have moved in, with a focused simulation of a specific historical era and no rigid endgame. This isn’t inherently a bad concept, but it is a relatively niche one, and now Civ is no longer the dominant force in strategy games. You’d pick a Civ and try to push toward a one of half-a-dozen victory conditions, instead of adapting It was also a damn good strategy game, with a simulation of great powers taking over the world and engaging with one another in alliances and wars.īut over time, especially starting with Civ 5, instead of playing in a living world - a simulation - Civ has become about making a long-term plan and sticking to it, with external pressure coming from enemies who might want to disrupt that plan. It was wildly ambitious - attempting to model the entirety of human history, as well as the near future. When initially developed in the early 1990s, Sid Meier’s Civilization became the poster child for what all strategy games could be. To get at why that is, it’s worth discussing what Civilization has become.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |